<! -------------------------------------------------------------- >
<! Your Text Goes Below >
<! -------------------------------------------------------------- >
AB1810: A defendant charged with a felony may have it dismissed if a
mental health expert persuades a judge the offense resulted from a
treatable mental disorder. "the most irresponsible legislation our
state has ever seen" DA Summer Stephen. A criminal convicted
of a Felony could avoid any prison time and be released into the
public under a mental health professional's supervision. Felonies
are the most serious of crimes and include murder, rape, robbery, assault etc...
Shirley Weber voted for this law, took effect Jan. 2019
JOHN MOORE FOR ASSEMBLY 2020
79th California Assembly District
Shirley Weber's Horrendous Voting Record
My Opponent Shirley Weber voted "Yes" on every one of the following Senate and Assembly Bills.
I am against all of them.
AB860 Requires Every "Active" Voter To Receive A Mail-In Ballot,
whether requested by Voter or not ie; "The Harvest"
AB1921 created "Ballot Harvesting" of UNCLAIMED Ballots by Anonymous Ballot Gatherers in California.
Works with AB860 To Shield Fraud
AB186 Provided for illegal drug consumption (heroin) safe places without fear of prosecution or lost welfare benefits
AB1810 A defendant charged with a felony may have it dismissed if a mental health condition existed at the time of the crime
SB239 Reduces criminal penalties for unprotected sex by those (includes prostitutes) infected with HIV-AIDS
Weber's signature bill, the Healthy Youth Act 2015, has been used to introduce sex toys and pornographic comic books
to 11 year-olds in SDUSD Sex Ed. Do you want this for your kids? Control must be given back to the parents.
SB1 Raised the California gasoline tax 12cents/gallon ($600 to $700 per family/yr) and Car Registration fee $25
to $175 depending on vehicle. WAKE UP - Gas Taxes have been diverted from roads to other uses for decades!!
SB1 Tax Do you know it AUTOMATICALLY INCREASES EVERY year!
AB1668 established a 55 gallons/resident/day as the standard for indoor residential water use.
Average use today is over 100 gallons/resident/day!! How would you reduce INDOOR USE over 45%???
AB1668 SEC.3. Section 1846.5 is added to the Water Code:
1846.5. (a) An urban retail water supplier based on drought conditions, can be fined ten thousand dollars
($10,000) each day the violation occurs. Other California Water Law permits the Supplier to pass fines
to residential customers.
My numeric proof, here on this Website, showed California has water over 400% above consumption, no restrictions
or $24 Billion Tunnels needed.
SB285 Prohibits public employers to discourage employees from joining a union.
Public Employees should have the freedom to choose too!
SB54 Sanctuary Cities Act, reduces cooperation between local police and Federal immigration authorities,>
interferes with the apprehension of criminal illegal aliens.
AB1008 Prohibits employers from asking job applicants about a criminal history
Shouldn't your bank manager know if a new teller has a criminal history?
More Water Reservoirs Not Tunnels · More Job Opportunities For Millennials
Affordable, Low Tax, Energy · End Sanctuary Cities ·
Stop Election Fraud
Sign the EIPCa. Petition for Presidential Intervention and Endorsement
to Prevent the "Unclaimed Ballot Harvest" ASAP!
500,000 Calif. Voters, Non-Voting Since 2008, May Still be "Active" on State Voter Rolls (despite a court order to
remove them) and will Receive Mail Ballots!
This is the "Ballot Harvest" of UNCLAIMED moved, dead, Transferred College students, multi-voters and alien ballots that
will fall into the hands of anonymous mail ballot gatherers who may fraudulently fill them out
The Court denied Newsom's XO had the authority to make such a request. The State Legislature then rushed to write AB860
into a Law that makes the same demand.
Shirley Weber voted for AB860 which has the potential to flood California's
ANONYMOUS "Ballot Harvesters" with a bonanza of 500,000 UNCLAIMED MAIL ballots.
All Mail Ballots have prepaid return mail postage to the Registrar of Voters. The "Harvester" could fill them out
then drop them in any mail box without anyone knowing he/she gathered and altered them.
AB1921 created "Ballot Harvesting" of Unclaimed Ballots by Anonymous Ballot Gatherers in California.
Shirley Weber voted for that too.
AB860 and AB1921 work a fraud together. AB860 releases the maximum number of potentially Unclaimed Ballots
into California's Election.
AB1921 authorizes Anonymous Ballot Gatherers To Collect Those Unclaimed Ballots, Mail them for Free to the ROV,
whether fraudulently altered or not.
Dr. James Veltmeyer, 4 times selected as San Diego's top physician and former State Senate candidate,
rejects the attempts of the media to discredit the use and efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine:
"...hydroxychloroquine, despite the best efforts of the left-wing press to ridicule its efficacy—has
been proven in study after study to work both as a preventative and greatly assist recovery in the
early stages of COVID ..."
Master of the Universe Bill Gates says "there will be no normalcy until the world is vaccinated", like our Governor Newsom he too is unaware of your Constitutional Rights to reject vaccination.
If your child is the only unvaccinated kid in the classroom can he infect the others? Of course not, they are all vaccinated. So the only person in "danger" is the unvaccinated. The argument that everyone has to be vaccinated is specious.
9 American Physicians Promote the Use of HydroxyChloroQuine Against Covid-19, Deride the Unscientific Government Propaganda Against HCQ, Demand They Be Given Access to HCQ Despite Pharmacists Refusing to Fill Prescriptions. Africa Has a Much Lower Covid-19 Death Rate Because HCQ is In Use For other Native Diseases and Widely Available. This Is the Reason Early Studies this Year Discovered the That Africans Had a Stronger Immunity to Covid-19, the Cause was Mistakenly Assigned to Genetics Rather than HCQ Since It Was Officially Banned In The USA. Masks Are Not Effective Against The Spread of Covid-19 is Their Unanimous Opinion, "...Like Throwing Sand Through A Chain Link Fence...".
Certain Conclusions Unavoidably Follow: First: HCQ Is Safe, Inexpensive and Effective!, Second: The New $Billion "VACCINE" Is UNNECESSARY!, Third: The Economic Lockdown IS UNNECESSARY!, Fourth: Masks Are UNNECESSARY!, Fifth: Social Distancing Is UNNECESSARY!, Sixth: The only NECESSARY Thing is HCQ!, Seventh: Certain State and Local Officials are the only NECESSARY THINGS FOR THIS PHONY CRISIS!, There are two other curious elements. President Trump Was/Is on HCQ Therapy as of many weeks ago when he publicly announced it. Rumors are that many other Washington insiders were using it too. Are our State and Local officials using it too? Why didn't the Chinese Officials in Wuhan city use HCQ as soon as the Outbreak Was Discovered? Or Did they Authorize it only For Certain Citizens? One final comment, are you feeling like I am, that we are all involuntary and unknowing guinea pigs?
New Study of 2.6 Billion People in 3rd World Nations USING HCQ Shows a 79% LOWER Risk of Death From Covid-19 Compared to 3rd World Countries NOT USING HCQ. This is the largest population study done and strongly refutes the popular US media claim that HCQ is Deadly and Ineffective.
One Million March In Berlin Against Covid-19 and Economy Lockdown
Shouting "Freedom, Freedom" (in German of course)
Dr. Lee Merritt, Surgeon, 8/16/2020, BLASTS Fauci, Gates, Covid-19 Vaccine, Masks, Social Distancing and Moderna's Missing Animal testing as mentioned by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in July 2020 below
Several Physicians, Including Dr. Stella Immanuel, Prescribe HydroxyChloroQuine:
"There is a cure for Covid!, We Don't Need to die!" -- YouTube Blocks Her Impassioned Statement Of Truth
Exemplary Trauma Room Physician Fired for Supporting Hydroxychloroquine use Against Covid-19
Why is HCQ so hated by the media and medical authorities vs. the medical practitioners?
Here's the reason: HCQ means the LOCKDOWN, that so upset the little 4 year-old below,
is unnecessary. It means the new, rushed into development "vaccine" is unnecessary too.
It means the LOCKDOWN and "vaccine" are not for safety or medical
reasons, but for political reasons. It means the fear generated by the vicious media to keep the public
under control is unnecessary. It means we the public may have forgotten the lesson from a favorite
old movie, "The Wizard of Oz", in which a small dog pulls the curtain from behind a little old man
working the controls of a fearsome, giant media image on a stage. Today we have brave
and ethical physicians, pulling the curtain back for us to see that
the media fear about Covid-19 is a fraud because an inexpensive effective cure already exists.
HydroxyChloroQuine works, and it has been known for a long time,
the President knew, so why spend $Billions on a
"Rush to Judgement" Vaccine that will no doubt re-introduce
many of the pathogens well known in current vaccines?
Why is the new "vaccine" being prepared in batches
large enough to inoculate every individual American?
Will it be mandatory for every individual American too?
The Covid family has only 20 variants, including
the common cold, for which science has never found a cure, but
we are assured, by failed experts, that science will find a Covid-19 vaccine.
While HCQ does not give immunity as would a vaccine, so what??.
HCQ costs only $50 to $100, it works across all ages, whether healthy or very ill,
it requires no $multi-Billion research program. It has been deliberately denigrated
without cause, when it should have been heralded by
government and the medical world. This doesn't make sense.
But on some level it does make sense, to someone, cui bono?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. warned Americans on Thursday (7/23/20) to
be cautious about any new coronavirus vaccine, pointing out
that key parts of testing are being skipped
"The Moderna vaccine, which is the lead candidate, skipped the
animal testing altogether,” Kennedy said during an online debate on
mandatory vaccinations with renowned Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz.
"They use what they call exclusionary criteria,” Kennedy said.
“They are only giving these vaccines in tests that they're doing to the
“healthiest people.” If you look at their exclusionary idea criteria: You
cannot be pregnant, you cannot be overweight, you must have never smoked a
cigarette, you must have never vaped, you must have no respiratory
problems in your family, you can't suffer asthma, you can't have
diabetes, you can't have rheumatoid arthritis or any
autoimmune disease. There has to be no history of seizure in the family.
These are the people they're testing the vaccine on.”
20% of the small 45 person Moderna Test group became ill after vaccination.
75,000 to 100,000 Lives could be saved:
Yale Epidemiologist Defends Physicians Using HydroxyChloroQuine for Covid-19 Patients
Father's Camera Catches 4 Year-old Daughter During Anti-Lockdown Rant, Very Funny
(click "Watch on YouTube" when second screen appears)
Prestigious British Med. Journal "Lancet" Retracts Previous HCQ Dangers
The outright lying about Hydroxychloroquine's ineffective and dangerous character has reached the highest levels
of the International Medical establishment. In a rare and embarrassing reversal one of the top 5 Medical Journals
in the world, the "Lancet", has completely retracted it's previous condemnation of using HCQ against Covid-19.
Dr. Ron Paul Has Doubts About The Covid-19 "pandemic"
Astronomical Rise in Unemployment Claims Since the Covid-19 Economy Lockdown Has the Cost in Lost Jobs (Bankruptcies too) Been Necessary? (vertical line far right) There is a better way, quarantine and treat the symptomatic, isolate the elderly and infirm from crowds, let the healthy work and only count those who died solely from C-19, with no co-morbidities (additional fatal diseases) As of a month ago, late May to early June 2020, deaths in San Diego solely from C-19 were only 20
Covid-19 for the US: NEW CASES AND NEW DEATHS, note cases are rising but deaths are crashing. Note Deaths include multiple morbidities not just Covid-19 If Deaths with co-morbidities were removed, the Death count would be much smaller than shown
Recently Released LMPD Video(7/23/20)of 5/30/20 Riot &Arson at LMPD HQ, on the left, also References Mrs. Furcron
Throwing an Object At Police, After A Declaration of "Unlawful Assembly" and An Order to Disperse By Police
La Mesa Burned While Shirley Weber Slept
Her Solution: Ban Police From Using Rubber Bullets On A Mob Like The One That Burned La Mesa
The Riots of May 30th-31st 2020 which were allowed to run their course of destruction and violence unimpeded by La Mesa PD
or the Sheriff Dept. must be investigated (Questions submitted to LM City Council on June 17th, no response yet 8/2/20 ---- on 8/13/20 LM City Council Began a Citizen's Inquiry on the questions raised below about the Riots of May 30th thru 31st. La Mesa Police Chief Vasquez Immediately Resigned on word of the Inquiry, see above, no comment from Sheriff Gore):
1) Why were the two police agencies not present at the La Mesa Shopping Center rampage that lead to heavy losses for the Vons Supermarket and other smaller retailers?
2) Why were the two police agencies unable to stop the 2 Banks from being burned to the ground?
3) What kind of devices were used to completely burn the banks to the ground?
4) Were the arsonists professional in starting the bank fires?
5) Were either or both of the police agencies given instructions to "stand down" and not respond to the riots? If so what office gave the order to "stand down" and not respond to the rioters?
6) Is the city of La Mesa liable for damages because it didn't fulfill its' official obligations to protect citizens and their property?
7) During the same weekend there was a riot in downtown San Diego from a similar group but San Diego Police were in force and 100 were rioters were arrested. Official arrest records show a total of only 7 arrests over the 30th and 31st of May by the La Mesa PD yet the number of rioters were approximately the same in both cities. Why are the LM arrests so low compared to the SD PD? Were all 7 LM arrests of rioters or others not involved in the riots? SD Police Arrest 100 Rioters
8) Who organized the demonstration and riots in La Mesa on the 30th and 31st of May?
9) Are any guilty parties (rioters) under arrest or in custody?
10) Are there active investigations by LM PD or SD Sheriff to find the organizers of the LM demonstration and riots?
11) How will riots be stopped in the future?
12) Why weren't the LM PD and Sheriff Dept. trained and prepared for civil unrest?
13) What is the estimated value of all the property lost on the 30th and 31st of May in La Mesa?
14) How were the protesters able to commandeer Interstate 8 in La Mesa, were any arrested for walking on the I-8 Freeway car lanes?
15) Who financed the BLM demonstrators/rioters?
16) Were there any recordings of the cell phone conversations of the rioters and their coordinators on the evening of the 30th?
17) Is there a reason that the FBI or Homeland Security did not or could not warn La Mesa of the trouble headed it's way long before the rioters arrived in the city of La Mesa?
18) Is there a reason all the rioters were able to escape capture?
19) Were there criminals and felons deliberately hired by the demonstrators to ransack and destroy property in LM?
La Mesa Police Dept.(LMPD)Shows Only 7 Arrests, 1 on Sat. 6 on Sunday, for May 30th thru 31st 2020, SDPD Arrested 100 Over the Same Weekend During a Downtown Riot
Outsiders Attempt 2nd La Mesa Riot
Yesterday, 8/1/2020, a couple hundred outsiders attempted to repeat the arson and looting free-for-all that
occurred in La Mesa over the weekend of 5/30 to 5/31/2020. The thinly veiled reason for attempting another
riot of lawbreaking and property destruction was the death of a black woman in Kentucky. Kentucky is 2,500
miles east of La Mesa. There is no connection between La Mesa, its citizens or its Police Department and
the death of the Kentucky woman. That is a Kentucky local problem, not a La Mesa problem. Kentucky is the
place to air their grievance.
The invaders didn't worry about such awkward pretenses, their goal was no doubt to repeat the looting and
burning of an easy target, La Mesa, just like a couple of months ago. Here their plans went sour.
Instead of the absent police force they encountered in May, there was
an overwhelming police presence that immediately and and forcefully stepped into
action whenever the would-be-looters moved against Police orders.
I saw about 30-35 non-LM Police cars, LM Police & Sheriff cars, at least
one from as far away as Carlsbad, in the "battle ground" on either side of the La Mesa Police HQ
which was blocked to the hilt by brand new black, steel barricades.
There was no access to the LMPD parking lot or its front entrance where the May riot began.
The Protesters assembled behind the Von's Supermarket, across the street from the City Of La Mesa
administrative offices and LMPD. The Anti-Protesters gathered at the VFW building (which was vandalized
during the nighttime rioting in May) across the street but
on the opposite side of the LMPD from the rioters and
arsonists in waiting. The VFW was another disappointment to the black garbed marauders. It was crammed
full of big, tough Vets with a score to settle. The Police had wisely surrounded the Vet gathering and
VFW building in yellow barrier tape (for the protection of the Protesters).
Every commercial street corner in downtown La Mesa had 4 to 8 Policemen standing duty in a 3 block
area of the "battleground". The Protestor's demonstration officially started at 3:30pm but about 10 or
15 minutes before that a contingent tried to cross the street to the VFW, the Police quickly
intercepted them and turned them back to their gathering point behind Vons. That was a little
disappointing for the Vets. A police helicopter circled above for several hours. A cache(s)
of bricks and/or rocks were discovered preplaced for the “peaceful” vandals.
Around 6:30pm the Protestors began their approved march around the block which passed directly
by the VFW on the opposite side of the 4 lane street between them. The Police were a barrier between
the two groups which harangued each other but the Protestors didn't make an
attempt to break the Police line.
The Anti-Protestors at the VFW were leery to leave early, especially before nightfall. That was
when the major damage, burning of two banks, other buildings and looting began in the May riots.
Some fights were reported, one jaw broken at a gas station. Many VFW people were still around
at 11:00pm, about the time I departed. So far I haven't seen any reports of the looting and
burning that happened in May.
☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆
Law Suit Endorsement
Recently JD Bols filed suit in Federal Court San Diego against Governor Newsom to obtain
Constitutional (California and Federal),Legislative and case law required recompense, for
for the taking of his personal property by the State of California under Governor Newsom's
Covid-19 "Lockdown" Executive Order.
The manner of the "taking" is novel. The Governor's "Lockdown" Executive Order unilaterally
forced Bols' business renters to stop working and closed Bols's property from further use until
an undetermined time in the future when the Executive Order is rescinded. For approximately
2 months Bols real property has been illegally taken from his hands, by infringing on his rights
of real property ownership, by the Governor, and with it the necessary personal property rents
that would have flowed to Bols as the registered owner of the real properties.
Bols requests justifiable recompense, as required by law, in the amount of all rents unpaid during
the time control of his real property has been and will continue to be illegitimately taken from
his hands. Bols also requests the return of his real property rights to use his property for any
legitimate purpose. Bols demands the Governor and State follow the laws of the Federal and State
Constitutions, California Legislation and California case law (all referenced below) to correct
the current illegitimate taking of his property.
This law suit is a specific microcosm of the larger problem created by the fast and loose
illegitimate procedures forcibly enacted on every business and citizen of the State of Cali-
fornia by careless and likely ignorant elected and appointed officials at the highest offices
of our State.
This law suit is a warning to all Californians, that the current highest elected officer of
California is uneducated on the limitations of his power and by instinct follows the lead of the
Chinese Communist Party procedures, without reflection on American laws to the contrary, as
described immediately below. Our Governor is not alone, several other state governors are equally
uneducated on the American laws which place limitations on their power. It has taken a law
suit by a single citizen to expose that very disturbing point.
Our California Governor's use of a widespread shutdown of businesses and extreme restrictions on the
movement of citizens was clearly modeled after the Chinese example used in Wuhan city, Hubei Province
during their Covid-19 outbreak in late 2019 - early 2020. We must recall that China is a Communist
country, run by the Chinese Communist Party, CCP, and such extreme measures are the product of a
The United States, we are compelled to remember, falls under the American Constitution which prohibits
the unilateral taking of private property by Government without two things: 1) Due Process of Law
2) Just Compensation to the harmed party. American courts have consistently supported the notion that
a taking of property from a private citizen, business or corporation for the benefit of the general
public must be borne by that same public (since the public is the beneficiary), through the same agency
of government that took the property. Therefore compensation is due to the private former owner of the property.
Property includes Personal Property (Income, Salary, Cash, Rents, Collectibles, Vehicles, Tools, Equipment,
Heirlooms, Harvested Crops, Livestock) and Real Property (Real Estate).
In a Communist country items 1 and 2 above are not established or required.
In the United States, under the Constitution, a declaration of a State of Emergency does not remove the
obligation of 1 and 2 above. Indeed even a State of War does not relieve the US Government of that obligation.
During the Civil War Union officers would write a receipt to an individual farmer whose horses, food or other
valuables were taken for use in the War effort (this does not include damage done to the enemy's property
by combat). The receipt would be taken by the farmer to a military post for cash compensation in the amount
deduced by the farmer and issuing Army officer.
The type of recompense given a former property owner in the Covid-19 outbreak could take many forms. The
Governor could have allowed forgiveness of State Income Taxes, Property Taxes, State Sales Taxes and/or cash.
Likewise the lower officials compelled to follow the Governor's Executive Order could have made tax concessions
and/or cash compensation. These options would have lessened or even eliminated the necessity of the Governor
going to the Legislature to establish a Compensation Fund, though that could have been done in conjunction
with the other options.
The most disturbing revelation is not the choice of recompense the California State Governments could have
offered but the sad conclusion that the 5th Amendment's constitutionally required recompense was never even
considered by the State, County or City Governments.
The California Government Code Title 2, Chapter 7, Article 3, Section 8572 underwrites the Federal 5th Amendment
by requiring the Governor to pay the reasonable value of any property commandeered during a state of Emergency.
The Governor is in violation of the US Constitution and State Law too.
The Governor is also in violation of the California Constitution Article1, Section19 which demands that: Private
property may be taken or damaged for a public use and only when just compensation, ascertained by a jury
unless waived, has first been paid to, or into court for, the owner.
In this specific case Plaintiff JD Bols lost tens of thousands in rental income from the Governor's Covid-19
Executive Order that forcefully closed his business renters while he continued to incur expenses for
mortgage interest, maintenance, taxes and insurance on his property.
The Chinese officials of Wuhan strictly prohibited demonstrations against their Covid-19 lockdown. Similarly,
during the first few days of the Governor Newsom's shutdown Executive Order, California citizens were
prohibited from demonstrating against our Lockdown. The right of the people to a public redress of grievances
against a government action is part of the 1790 Bill of Rights, the First Amendment, in our Federal Constitution.
Luckily that was revised after a few days, but the alarming fact remains that the Chinese Communist protocol
was the first option chosen by our constitutionally elected Governor Newsom.
In Wuhan the Chinese officials quarantined everyone without inspection. That is the power of the Communist State.
In America things are different. California Courts have limited the authority of Public Health Officials
over personal liberty. The power to quarantine an individual must be based in reasonable grounds that the
person to be held is indeed infected and the disease is infectious. Ex parte Martin, 83 Cal. App. 2d 164 (1948).
Public Health Officials must be able to show "probable cause to believe the person so held has an infectious disease...".
Under Governor Newsom's Executive Order of a State of Emergency, the Covid-19 disease presents California with the first
instance where the healthy, uninfected individuals were also quarantined! This is in direct contradiction to
California Court precedence and the Martin case cited above. Again we are dismayed by the Governor's actions
which mimic the Communist Chinese model while trampling California court decisions.
Nothing has been as irritating as the arbitrary designation of "essential businesses".
The term "essential" was taken
from a Federal Gov. list of essential Federal operations. I don't believe that gave rules for selecting one retailer
over another. Wal-Mart and CostCo are retail businesses that are deemed "essential" and allowed to remain open.
Small, independent retailers are not "essential" (except to their families). Small retailers have fewer customers on premises,
many fewer than large retailers so they are less likely to spread disease. Are the large retailers safer?
They should both be open for business.
I have discussed only the 5 most egregious Causes of Action of the 11 Causes of Action in the JD Bols Federal Law Suit.
There is one stunning, depressing and unintended point that comes clear through all the formal 11 Causes of Action.
His suit has exposed an alarming trend in the Governor's office to follow overreaching directives that mimic
the decisions and actions of the largest Communist leadership in the world, Communist China.
There appears to be little respect or awareness in the Governor's office for the US Constitution and the
California Constitution, both of which place many more restraints on government than the Communist Chinese model.
I endorse this suit against the Governor's office in the hope that respect and awareness for Constitutional government,
legislation and respect for California Case Law precedents in our State will be restored.
79th Assembly District Candidate 2020
May 17th 2020